EVENT 1: "WHAT'S NEXT? Eco Materialism and Contemporary Art" BY LINDA WEINTRAUB

Photo 1: Photo with Linda Weintraub. I am the furthest right
person in the photo.
On April 18th, I had the pleasure of attending a lecture by Linda Weintraub called “WHAT’S NEXT? Eco Materialism and Contemporary Art”. In this lecture, Linda talked about the impact of mankind on nature and about her adoption of a sustainable lifestyle. However before getting to this larger discussion, Linda explored some other concepts. 

One very interesting concept that Linda explored was the different expectations of mankind from nature. She herself was directed towards this discussion when she was visiting a beautiful place with her friend. Upon her expressing the beauty of nature with great excitement, her friend asked her the question “Is that all?”. Linda took it upon herself to explore this question and use work by different artists to explore their viewpoints on this topic. Two particular artists that Linda explored that really jumped out at me were Frederic Church and Claude Monet.

Photo 2: Monet's Incredible Painting
Church and Monet had contrasting opinions on nature. Although both artists portray the beauty of nature in their paintings, they do it any very different manners. Church held the belief that nature was too unruly and disorganized to exhibit beauty. He believed that it was an artist’s duty to organize and harmonize nature, in order to achieve true beauty. He manipulated the nature around him to make it beautiful. However, Monet simply painted nature as he saw it. He believed that world is already exceptionally beautiful and there was no need to manipulate it. If these artists were posed the question “Is that all?”, they would quite likely have different answers. Monet’s resounding yes would probably be met by Church’s no. However, I personally would have to side with Monet on this discussion.

Photo 3: Using VR to view Phantom
Another interesting artwork that Linda talked about was the work by Daniel Steegmann Mangrané called “Phantom”. Mangrané uses new technology such as Oculus technology to recreate a piece of the Brazilian rainforest, in a virtual reality setting. A person trying to view to view this artwork would put on a headgear and walk through the rainforest as shown in Photo 3. This is a brilliant way to raise awareness of the rainforests, which are rapidly disappearing, and really show the negative impact of mankind. 

Towards the end of the lecture, Linda talked about the larger discussion of ecological impact of human behavior, and her own project. Her project is part of a larger social movement of ecological sensibility, and in this she showed us how she had created her own balanced ecosystem. She has adjusted her lifestyle in a way such that she completely lives off the land and fulfills most of her needs through things found naturally. From growing her own food to raising her own animals to using wood from the forest for heat and building fences, she only relies on nature. It was very cool to see her process of making maple syrup. I also really liked the little pond she made in her house.



Photo 4: Plants Linda grows and forages in her own forest
Photo 5: Pond made with stones she found near the river  


I was very impressed with the point she was trying to make. I agree that sustainability is a growing need for humanity, and everyone needs to make some contribution. Although adopting a similar lifestyle to what Linda has is unrealistic, I definitely think that more can and needs to be done by us.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WEEK 8: NANOTECH AND ART

Image
Nanotechnology is a field of incredible potential. It is surprising that a field such as nanotechnology, which has revolutionized all aspects of our life, from food to our clothes to medicines, is known so little. It was fascinating to see the mere number of subfields that have been created under the umbrella of nanotechnology, such as nanomedicine, nanoelectronics and nanophotonics. One of the most surprising examples of use of nanotechnology by the Romans in the Lycurgus Cup. The cup will appear green when lit from front, but if it were lit from the back it would change color to red. This change in color happens due to presence of gold and silver particles that are 50 nanometers in diameter. The fact that romans were able to do this 1600 years ago is absolutely amazing. Furthermore, nanotechnology is also present in nature. The wings of the Blue morpho butterfly seem to have a blue iridescent color but are in fact transparent. Their wings consist of many nano-scale structure...
Read more

WEEK 6: BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ART

Image
Biotechnology, according to the Convention on Biological Diversity, is any technological application that uses living organisms to modify products or processes for specific use. The use of biotechnology in art seems almost inevitable, given how easily technology and robotics have been used in art. More specifically use of genomes in art has been particularly of interest.   George Gessert’s work is a great example of bioart. Gessert created genetic hybrids of irises by hybridizing wild varieties and removing undesirable results. This created unique synthetic breeds of irises that had immense aesthetic beauty. However, this has been a very controversial area. Genetic engineering has raised many ethical dilemmas and discussions, which were only furthered by using it in art. The most important ethical question facing bioart, is whether life itself is a valid expressive medium. Bioartists seem to constantly face this question, especially when they use animals in their artwork. Edua...
Read more

WEEK 7: NEUROSCIENCE AND ART

Image
The intersection of art and neuroscience is a very interesting area. Historically, art was needed to study neuroscience. In the 19 th century, microscopy was not very advances, which meant that studying neurons was very difficult. Thus, scientists turned to artists to provide this information so that they could study neurons in more detail. Santiago Ramón y Cajal, the father of modern neuroscience, who was both an artist and a scientist, drew very detailed drawings of neurons and helped this field grow. This was followed by the use of neuroscience to create art. One cool example mentioned in the lecture was Brainbow. Brainbow involved using fluorescent proteins of different colors to light up neurons in order to be able to distinguish individual neurons. Also now, neuroscience is being used to study art. This falls under the field of neuroaesthetics , which specifically explores how and why people appreciate art, music and the very concept of beauty. Semir Zeki and Vilayanu...
Read more